Docker vs Podman

At a glance

1. Docker licenses the desktop; Podman has no paid tier

For teams paying for Docker Desktop, or about to. Docker's November 2026 pricing and licence terms distinguish the engine from the desktop:

Docker: the engine is open source; the desktop is a licensed product. Podman: the runtime has no daemon; the desktop uses Apache License 2.0.

• Docker Engine and Moby stay open source; Docker Desktop uses the Docker Subscription Service Agreement.
• Podman 6.1.4 and Podman Desktop 1.30.5 use Apache License 2.0 with no paid tier.

Choose paid Docker Desktop for its plan controls; choose Podman when eliminating licence fees justifies Docker-only API rewrites and socket-security responsibility.

2. Commercial Desktop seats become paid at 250 employees or $10 million revenue

Docker Desktop is free while a company has fewer than 250 employees AND less than $10 million in annual revenue. Both must hold. Government entities pay at any size.

The software did not change between those rows.

Business publishes no per-seat price. Docker Team's flat $15 per user/month charges for seats, not container usage.

3. Docker's money buys meters, and each meter is its own decision

Past the seat, paid plans attach meters, at Docker's prices:

At 4,000 Testcontainers minutes a month: 4,000 ÷ 100 = 40 blocks, so 40 × $4 = $160 on demand or 40 × $3 = $120 prepaid.

• DHI production with compliance support, 12 repos: 12 × $5,000 = $60,000/year floor. Enterprise DHI is quote-only and required for end-of-life software security.
• Build Cloud base minutes reset without accumulating; purchased extras expire each period. Buy extras only for work you expect to consume in that period.

4. Who should not pick Podman: teams without socket ownership

Podman's licence bill is $0. Its podman system service provides Docker v1.40 compatibility beside the native Libpod API. Socket-activated by systemd, it exits after 5 idle seconds by default.

With a rootless API service already listening:

export DOCKER_HOST=unix://$XDG_RUNTIME_DIR/podman/podman.sock

Check required API calls and rewrite Docker-only handlers. The command is unavailable directly on macOS or Windows; --time 0 disables inactivity timeout.

The man page warns:

"the API grants full access to all Podman functionality, and thus allows arbitrary code execution as the user running the API, with no ability to limit or audit this access"

Rootless narrows whose account is exposed; it does not make the socket safe to share.

• Skip Podman if required API calls are unsupported or nobody owns socket permissions.
• Avoid TCP exposure without mutual TLS; the man page suggests SSH forwarding instead.

5. Who should not pick Docker: government expecting free Desktop

Podman Desktop is free, Apache 2.0 and, in its own words, "trusted as part of the CNCF". It runs on Linux, macOS and Windows. Red Hat sells enterprise support as a build, the Red Hat Build of Podman Desktop, not as a licence tier.

• Docker Business includes SOC 2, SSO and SCIM, plus Hardened Docker Desktop and Image Access Management.
• Podman Desktop's enterprise path is that Red Hat build: support and long-term maintenance, not a licence tier.

Skip Docker if you are a government entity counting on the free tier; it never applied.

6. Who should pay Docker, and who should fund the port?

• Choose Docker Business for SSO, SCIM or Image Access Management; choose Team when audit logs and role-based access control meet your governance needs.
• Choose Podman below both free-tier limits if you can fund Docker-only API changes and own socket access before crossing either limit. So should a large org that wants per-seat × headcount off the budget and can staff the port.
• For 25 developers, Podman costs $0 in licence fees plus the port: Docker-only handler rewrites and socket security.

Business gates SSO, SCIM and Image Access Management; every plan carries Build Cloud minutes.

Check today:

1. Headcount and revenue against 250 and $10M. Both limits, not either.
2. Which CI jobs call the Docker API, and at what version.
3. Who can open the socket on your build hosts.

Cost arithmetic at volume

These are computed from the published unit prices, not measured. Each row prints its own formula, so you can replace our assumption with your traffic and redo it.

Decision matrix

Rows are the situation you are actually in. Pick the row before you read the pricing page again.

Code and configuration

# The engine is open source; Docker Desktop is the licensed surface.
$ docker run --rm -v "$PWD":/app -w /app node:24 npm ci
# Here it breaks: past 250 employees or $10M revenue, every
# commercial Desktop seat must be on Pro, Team or Business.
$ docker buildx bake --set "*.cache-from=type=registry"

# No daemon to start: each command is a process that runs and exits.
$ podman run --rm -v "$PWD":/app -w /app node:24 npm ci
# Docker tooling can use the compatibility socket:
$ systemctl --user start podman.socket
$ export DOCKER_HOST=unix://$XDG_RUNTIME_DIR/podman/podman.sock
# Here it breaks: that socket is full access as your user, so
# never bind it to TCP without mutual TLS.

What you gain, what you give up

Migration path

Common questions

Sources & verification

Prices and limits were read from these pages on 2026-11-10. Vendor marketing claims are quoted as claims. Anything derived is arithmetic on the numbers below.

Keep reading